"CONSPICUOUSLY
CONTRIVED, COUNTERFEIT SCIENCE" (E. Nyland)
--- In b_c_n_2003@yahoogroups.com, Polat Kaya
<tntr@C...> wrote:
Sayin Arkadaslar,
Dillerin kökeni ile
ilgilenlerin asagida URL adresini verdigim yaziyi
okumalari göz açici
olur kanisindayim. Edo Nyland Avrupa dillerinin
yapilmis diller
oldugunu söylüyor. Asagida yazisinin ilk iki
paragrafini
verdigim Edo Nyland adli arastiricinin söyledikleri benim
de basindan beri bu
sayfalarda söylediklerimi teyid ediyor. Avrupa
dilleri tamamen
suni olarak yapilmis dillerdir. Elbette ki benim
iddiam bu dillerin
Türkçeden "anagram" yoluyla asirildigi
iddiasidir. Bu
görüsümü de bu sayfalarda verdigim ve yüzlerce sözde
Hind-Avrupa
dillerine ait sözcüklerin aslinda Türkçe deyimlerden
yapilmis oldugunu
en inceligine kadar belirterek gösterdim.
Türkçe
"kirilma" islemine çok uygun bir dildir. Judeo-Christian
dinlerinin dinci
dilcileri ve olasilikla baskalari da bu gerçegi uzun
zamandan beri
bilmekte olduklarindan çesit çesit Avrupa dili ve
Semitik diller
yapmakta korkunç maharet göstermisler ve bu yapimsal
dillerin kökünün
binlerce sene geriye gittigi sahte iddiasini
etmislerdir. Bu
konuda sonu gelmeyen yanlis bilgilendirme olmustur
ve olmaktadir. Bir
taraftan Türkçenin sözlerinin ve bilhassa
deyimlerinin
asirilmasi günümüzde bile ustalikla becerilirken,
Türkçenin adindan
bile söz eden olmamistir. Türklere karsi olan
yaygin husumetin
kökünde Tur/Türk dünyasinin dünyaya medeniyet ve dil
verdigi gerçegi
yatmaktadir. Simdiye kadar ta Sumer Türklerinden
beri kaybolanlar
hep TUR insani olmus ve onlarin medeniyetleri talan
edilmistir. Böylece
eski Tur/Türk dünyasinin evrensel dini olan Gök-
Tanri Günes dini
yok edildigi gibi ve onun adini da tasiyan TUR Dili,
OGUZ dili ve Günes
dili olan Türkce de yok edilmeye çalisilmis ve
Türkçeden bir sürü
diller "kirma" yollu uydurulmustur. Bu arada
dinleri, adlari ve
dilleri sün'i sekilde degistirilen Türk
insanlari,
kavimleri Türk dünyasindan koparilarak yine Türk
dünyasina karsi
kullanilmislardir. Dünya dilleri konusunda
anlasilan sudur ki
günümüzde dillerin kökenini bulmak maksadiyla, çok
samimi olup fakat
yanlis yönlendirilmis binlerce arastirici
hayatlarini bir
uydurmanin arkasindan giderek harcamaktadirlar. Edo
Nyland'in yazisinin
tamamini okumanizi samimiyetle öneririm.
Selamlar,
Polat Kaya
===========
INDO-EUROPEAN
LINGUISTICS CONSPICUOUSLY CONTRIVED,
COUNTERFEIT
SCIENCE. LET US CONFUSE THEIR LANGUAGE (Gen. 11:7).
Every schoolchild
has been told the same story. In early times a
variety of peoples
came to British shores from the continent of
Europe. These
peoples had names such as Angles, Saxons, Friesians,
Vikings, Kelts,
Normans, you name them, and they all brought their own
peculiar and
primitive little languages along with them. These
languages then
somehow magically blended into the beautiful, rich and
practical language
we speak today. History also tells us that small
groups of people
arriving in a new country almost always accept the
language of their
new environment, usually within two or three
generations and
surely this happenend in Britain. But what happened
to the highly
developed language which was spoken by the inhabitants
of Britain? That
this language existed we know from the writings of
several early
missionaries. They even used it in their Ogam
inscriptions on
stone and in the Auraicept, the operations manual of
the Benedictine
monks. In Scotland the original language was called
Pictish, in Ireland
Cruithin and often it was referred to as the "Iron
Language". How
did it disappear and what was it like? Surely there
must be something
left of this first language of the British Isles, no
language ever
disappears without a trace, not in its home country.
Linguists, in this
century, decided that the early language of Britain
had been
non-Indo-European and many of them agreed that all of Europe
at one time was
unilingual, i.e. all people everywhere spoke the same
language. We are
told this also in Genesis 11:1, "Now the
whole earth had one
language....". This begs the question: If everyone
spoke the same
non-Indo-European language, what happened to change
this into a
plethora of unstable Indo-European and other languages?
The answer is:
Genesis 11:7 which tells us: "Come let us go down, and
there confuse their
language so they may no longer understand one
another's
speech". Could it be that the switch from the Universal
language to the
confusion of new and unstable languages was brought
about through
religious action? Did they take this sentence to be a
biblical command,
demanding action? Genesis 11:9: "It was in Babel
that the Lord
confused the language of all the earth; and from there
the Lord scattered
them abroad over the face of the earth". Could all
the Indo-European
languages be the product of highly skilled
religious linguists?
It may be hard to believe but that is exactly
what happened.
A FAULTY THEORY AND
A BAND-WAGON.
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
http://www.islandnet.com/~edonon/i-efraud.htm