About the name “VIKINGS”:
1. The
Vikings are regarded as “North Germanic” explorers, warriors, merchants, and
pirates who raided, traded, explored and settled in wide areas of Europe, Asia
and the North Atlantic islands …”,http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Vikings.
2. Vikings were the native
“non-Indo-European” ethnic elements of central, northern and eastern “European”
lands which have always been part of the Continent of Asia rather than a
separate continent. In my view, they are the root people of all so-called
“Indo-European” Europeans. They have been in
3. The so-called “Germanic peoples” are defined as peoples who are, or are
related to speakers of so-called “Germanic language”. The term “Germanic”
referred to native Turanian “tribal” groups who were
alienated from their original Turanian selves by way
of Christianization, Romanization and “Aryanization”.
Those missionaries of the Christian church establishment of the ancient
“Black-Magicians” and their politically motivated collaborators of Roman and
Hellenic and other Aryan rulers not only exterminated them at the opportune
times, but also vilified them endlessly and regarded them as “barbaric and less
civilized” people as compared to themselves.
The term “Germanic” is a concocted term which has been used to describe the
Christianized native “Celtic” peoples, that is, the so-called “Gallaic, Celtici, Celtica” or the “Galatians” of ancient Europe. Romans used
this term during the Aryanization and
Christianization of the native Gallic tribes that covered most of
I must also note that when the name CELTICA (CELTIC, CELTS, KELTIC)
is deciphered as “GALECITI”, I find that the term CELTICA is actually the
altered and reconstructed form of the Turkish word “GALECİDİ” meaning
“He is castle builder”!
So, the “Indo-European” appellation is a false term that has been used to
describe the ancient Turanian natives after they were
Romanized, Aryanized and Christianized and whose
languages were plundered and altered to come up with new "European"
languages.
4. Coming back to the name VIKINGS and its etymology, we have the following
information from the link at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Vikings#Weapons_and_warfare:
“Other chroniclers of Viking history include Adam of Bremen, who wrote
"There is much gold here (in
In plain English, the above says that the so-called “Vikings” were called
WICHINGI in one hand and ASCOMANNI in the other. These names are very
enlightening in the context that when we decipher them into Turkish, we get the
following new information. First I note that the letter W is a replacement for
letters UU or VV or YY or UV, UY, VY combinations as needed. Say with W = UU,
word WICHINGI becomes UUICHINGI. When UUICHINGI is deciphered as “GUNCHI-UII”,
then, UUICHINGI is the altered and restructured form of the
Turkish name “GÜNÇİ ÜYİ” (GÜNCÜ EVİ) meaning “House
of Sun believers”. And that is what these ancient Turanians
were religiously in “
Similarly, the second name ASCOMANNI, deciphered as “AS-COMAN-NI”,
is the Turkish expression “AS CUMANLI” meaning “One
KUMAN People” (one Kipchak people, One Kipchak Turks). Turkish word AS means “one”, CUMAN (COMAN)
is another name of the KIPCHAK Turks and suffix NI is a form of the Turkish
suffix LI meaning “with”.
I should even state that when we decipher the name
With all of these explanations, I say with confidence that the so-called
“Vikings” were ancient Tur/Turk/Oguz peoples who not
only settled all over Europe, but also went overseas to all kinds of distant
lands and also, in this case, to the American continents thousands of years
earlier than the famed Christopher Columbus!
With my best wishes to all,
Polat Kaya