Max Muller's writings about the Turkish language and the ancient Turanians

Dear Friends,


Recently I received a reference citation regarding the Turkish language from a dear friend, Michele Sorice.
The citing is from the famed German philologist Friedrich Max Müller expressing his views regarding the magnificence of the Turkish language and  the ancientness of the Turkish speaking Turanian TUR peoples. Thank you Michele for this excellent reference.

The citings from Max Müller's writings are given in red at the bottom of this writing.  They are very enlightening.  They support what I have been independently writing, about the Turkish language and the ancientness of the Turanian civilization, for the last ten years plus.  Particularly, the first citing from Max Müller states:

"The case is widely different with the turanian languages. Firstly, the area
over which they are spoken is much larger than that of the Arian and Semitic
dialects.
The latter occupy only what may be called the four Western Penisulas of the
great continent of the old world-India with Persia, Arabia , Asia Minor, and
Europe; and we have reason to suppose that even these countries were held by
Turanian tribes previous to the immigration of the Arian and Semitic races.
To our own times, by far the greater part of the primeval continent remains
in possession of the descendants of TUR."

Indeed, these words of Max Müller imply that Turkish was the oldest world language before Arian and Semitic languages came to be. To these words of Max Müller, I want to add the following citings from Genesis 11.  Genesis 11 says that the world was speaking one language when it states: "1. And the whole earth was of one language, and of one speech".  That one language was intentionally confused by the religious order of a Semitic "god" when it further states: "7. Go to, let us go down, and there confound their language, that they may not understand one another's speech."  In view of all the evidences, I have been saying in my writings that that "one world language" was none other than Turkish.  Surely, if that unnamed "one language" had been Semitic or Aryan, the Semitic god would not have issued such an order to confuse and destroy it.  The other languages were created by the intentional "confounding", (meaning "confusing, altering, discomposing, restructuring, puzzling, mystifying, demolishing, etc."), of this ancient Turanian world language.


Turkish is the progenitor language to many other languages - and, most likely, it was being spoken on earth as a well organized language before others were not even formulated from Turkish yet.  The world lived its golden years during the "Turkish Era" (http://www.polatkaya.net/Turkish_Era.htm) of the Turanians - although they would vehemently deny this fact and con themselves and the rest of the world.  I am confident in saying that many European scholars knew in the past that the European languages and civilization were sitting on the foundations of the ancient Turanian language and civilization  - rather than Greek or Roman or Semitic. But the scholars were silenced by the forceful suppression of the new "religious" organizations that wanted to spread over the land mass named "Europe" (and other areas) covering over and obliterating that ancient civilization of the Turanians.  And in that process they wiped out all traces that pointed to the ancient Turanians and their civilizations.

It is said that in the Babylonian pantheon, ENLIL, that is, the wind god, which was taken from the Sumerian pantheon, was replaced by an obscure god of Babylon named Marduk, [from a book by Georges Roux, entitled "Ancient IRAQ", Penguin Books, 1964, p. 88].

It is also said that: "Enlil was certainly less an usurper than Marduk", [Georges Roux, p. 88].   This implies that both Enlil and Marduk were usurpers not only in the context of stealing positions of power, but also in the context of stealing the language and civilization of Turanians for Semitic use. It is known that the Semitic Akkadians and Babylonians usurped most everything from the Sumerians (and other Turanians) - which included altering the names of the Sumerian pantheon for their own purposes.  Surely, the Akkadian and Babylonian usurpers would not have stopped with the usurpation of just the Sumerian pantheon. They would have gone ahead and usurped the Sumerian language and civilization for Semitic use as well.  After all, their intention was to usurp and destroy this ancient civilization of Turanians.

The below citings (in red) from Max Müller should help to clarify the ancientness of the Turanian civilization - and its huge contribution to the world.

Best wishes to all,

Polat Kaya

03/05/2010



-------- Original Message --------

Subject:	Max Muller
Date:	Tue, 27 Apr 2010 10:26:39 +0300
From:	Fortem1 <info@...>
To:	<tntr@...>

Dear Polat Kaya,
 
Referring to our conversation of yesterday I am sending to you excerpts from
Max Müller book The languages of the seat of war in the east. Second edition
1855.
 
"The case is widely different with the turanian languages. Firstly, the area
over which they are spoken is much larger than that of the Arian and Semitic
dialects.
The latter occupy only what may be called the four Western Penisulas of the
great continent of the old world-India with Persia, Arabia , Asia Minor, and
Europe; and we have reason to suppose that even these countries were held by
Turanian tribes previous to the immigration of the Arian and Semitic races.
To our own times, by far the greater part of the primeval continent remains
in possession of the descendants of TUR."
 
"Few languages are so easy, so intelligible, and I might almost say, so
amusing as Turkish. Its real a pleasure to read the Turkish grammar, even
without the wish to aquire it practically. The ingenious manner in which the
numerous grammatical forms are brought out, the regularity which pervades
the system of declension and conjugation, the transparency and
intelligibility of the whole structure must strike all who have a sense for
that wonderful power of the of the human mind which has displayed itself in
language."
 
"In the grammar of the Turkish language we have before us a language of
perfectly transparent structure and a grammar whose inner workings we can
study, as if watching the building of cells in a crystal beehive. An eminent
Orientalist remarked "we might imagine Turkish to be the result of the
deliberations of some eminent society of learned men" but no such society
could have devised what the mind of man produced, left to itself in the
steppes of Tatary , and guided by its innate laws, or by an instinctive
power as wonderful as any within the realm of nature."  
 
I hope you enjoy above references.
 
Best Regards
Michele Sorice