No. 1) To: Mr. Rogers
To: Mr. James M. Rogers,
I read your last
postings but I must say that they proved to be a big
disappointment. The
more you write, the more your writings sound like
a used-car
salesmen's oration. There is a lot of verbosity and
"Babylonian"
babbling but very little value and logic, if any at all.
Evidently they are
designed to confuse the reader and the issue being
discussed. But that
does not seem to be your concern. I can see that
your verbosity is
designed to divert the discussion away from the
Greek and other
Indo-European words whose true identity I have shown
to be of Turkish
origin. Your "diversion" tactic is very much similar
to that of the
sandpiper who tries to divert approaching danger away
from its nest by
deception.
I must tell you
that no matter how much verbosity and diversion
tactics you employ,
you will not deter the spread of the facts I have
outlined about the
nature of IE and Semitic languages and how they
were manufactured
from Turkish. Those facts will be known among truth
searching linguists
whether you like it or not. The world has been
conned by a few
secretive cult operators for far too long. The public
at large deserves
to know the facts clearly and concisely.
In arguing with me
you must always remember that I am the one who
claims that the
Indo-European and Semitic languages have been secretly
manufactured from
Turkish. To prove my point, I give the proof in
terms of
manufactured Greek, Latin, English and other language words
where I clearly
demonstrate how they are distortions of a Turkish word
or phrase. You are
supposed to dwell on my examples and not divert the
discussion to some
other irrelevent direction. You can tell me that I
am right in which
case you will be regarded as accepting my point, or
tell me that I am
wrong in which case you must conclusively prove it.
Verbosity,
bafflegab and dillydallying are unacceptable, otherwise you
will be regarded as
an intentional "confuser" and "trickster" as you
have been doing in
all of your postings. Besides, I do not have time
for that kind of
wandering vacillation.
You described
yourself as someone who likes word games and puns.
Instead of being
genuinely interested in finding the true nature of
the IE and Semitic
languages, you are playing games with me. You are
fixated on trying
to find artificial weaknesses in my argument where
there is none. You
have even altered some of my explanations and
attributed
verbology to me when I never said it. In your subtle ways,
you are throwing
mud on me but you are not being scholarly although
you try hard to put
that kind of a gloss on it.
My revelation,
which I have proven with many examples, states that
the Indo-European
and Semitic languages are artificial languages
manufactured from
Turkish words and phrases but without acknowledging
and crediting the
Turkish source. This is the "fire" that you are
trying to put out
with verbosity and diversions, however, this will
not be easy to do
because people are reading and making judgements
for themselves.
I have responded to
your last postings separately, and most likely for
the last time, as I
do not have time for your endless rambling. You
have already got
more of my time than you deserve. You are still
welcome, however,
to continue to read and learn from my revelations.
Best wishes to all,
Polat Kaya.